|
AJR in the Classroom
Discussion
questions for the October/November 2005 issue, along with suggestions for
further readings on hurricanes and disaster coverage, reporter-source
relationships and gun-toting journalists:
Stories 1 and 2:
Essential Again and Apocalypse in New Orleans | Story 3: Uncharted Terrain | Story 4:
Gun-Toting Journalists
STORIES 1 and 2: “Essential
Again:
As the tragedy of Katrina unfolded,
the battered mainstream media elevated their games, challenging inaccurate
statements by public officials and providing crucial information to an audience
that needed it desperately,” By Marc Fisher;
and "Apocalypse in New Orleans: A firsthand account of how a small band of
Times-Picayune journalists covered devastation and misery in their shattered
home,"
By Brian Thevenot.
MORE INFO:
From Marc Fisher: "Once again, we understood the power of mass media, the shared
experience of a nation gathering in its living rooms to see momentous events on
television, to feel the satisfaction of reading a newspaper's first shot at
making sense of difficult and complex times. ... what connected most effectively
was what much of the blogger world had so derided: firsthand reporting by
professional observers." In New Orleans, the Times-Picayune led the way.
Reporters evacuated from the downtown building survived on adrenalin, camping
out at a staffer's house on high ground and dictating scribbled stories over
borrowed phone lines to editors in Baton Rouge.
CLASS/PANEL DISCUSSION
AND RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT:
-
Major news organizations generally have detailed plans in
place for how they will cover major news (such as presidential elections and
major trials), tragedies (plane or train crashes, terrorist strikes) or natural
disasters. Invite in editors and news directors from your area TV stations,
daily newspapers and Web sites. Ask them to discuss their disaster
coverage plans: When disaster strikes, what reporters and editors are expected
to immediately report to the newsroom? Who would be in charge? How would
responsibilities for reporting/editing/shooting pictures be divvied up? In the
event of bombs, floods or electrical outages, how would the publications get
their products out? And would reporters and photographers be expected to wear or
carry any special gear (such as flak jackets, gas masks or guns)? Have these
plans changed significantly in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist strikes and
Hurricane Katrina?
-
How well did the news media cover the race issue in New
Orleans, where the hardest-hit in the hurricane tragedy were African Americans?
Assign a 1,500- to 2,000-word research paper, exploring this topic. Encourage
students to use LexisNexis to cite specific articles in major publications.
ADDITIONAL READINGS AND LINKS:
"Playing Big," column by Rem Rieder, in the October/November 2005
issue of AJR."Bearing Witness,"
column by Deborah Potter, in the October/November
2005 issue of AJR.
"Online Search and Rescue,"
column by Barb Palser, in the October/November
2005 issue of AJR.
"Covering Hurricanes: Ethical concerns, best practices, profiles in
coverage, reports from the field and more"- resources from Poynteronline.
"Online Coverage of Hurricane Katrina,"
- links from Online Journalism
Review readers.
"The Online NewsHour: Katrina Media Coverage," a transcript from a
Sept. 29, 2005, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, along with audio and video.
Special reports on Hurricanes Katrina and Rita from selected news organizations:
washingtonpost.com,
nytimes.com, usatoday.com, The BBC News,
CNN.com, MSNBC.com,
and, of course, The Times-Picayune's nola.com.
STORY 3:
“Uncharted Terrain: While it's too
soon to gauge the extent of the damage, the Judith Miller/Matthew Cooper case
already has clouded source-reporter relationships and impelled news
organizations and journalists to reexamine practices ranging from negotiating
with sources to taking and storing notes.” By Rachel Smolkin
MORE INFO:
According to Smolkin: "The reviews of standard journalistic techniques have
raised sensitive questions, including ... Who owns a reporter's notes? Should
news organizations hand out laptops or external hard drives to give individual
journalists - rather than the company - control over their work? How long should
a reporter save notes?" At some papers, Smolkin notes, editors and
reporters have detected greater hesitancy among some sources to disclose
information. Other reporters are noticing a greater reluctance among sources to
send or receive e-mails.
CLASS ASSIGNMENTS AND DISCUSSION:
-
Assign each of your students to contact editors at
different newspapers or TV stations - including those on campus - to determine
what their policies are regarding the use and protection of anonymous sources.
Students should be sure to ask if those policies have been revised in light of
the Judith Miller and Matthew Cooper cases, and if reporters at those
publications are noticing any changes in their interactions with sources.
Students should type up their responses and be prepared to both turn them in and
share them with the class.
-
According to Smolkin, the Newspaper Association of America
reports that within the last 18 months, more than two dozen reporters have been
subpoenaed or questioned about their confidential sources in cases before the
federal courts. Ask each student to research details of one of those cases and
to write an 800-word summary, discussing the reporters and news organizations
involved, the reason for the subpoena and the outcome.
ADDITIONAL READINGS AND LINKS:
-
"Candor Times: The New York
Times must tell us the inside story of the Judith Miller case," Web-only
column by Rem Rieder,
posted on ajr.org Oct. 11, 2005.
-
"No Longer a Beacon of
Hope: An African journalist laments the message Judith Miller's jailing sends to
the rest of the world," by Alagi Yorro Jallow, in the October/November issue
of AJR.
-
"A
Magazine Is Not a
Newspaper: An Alabama case shows why crafting a shield law isn't easy,"
column by Jane Kirtley, in the October/November issue of AJR.
-
"Lessons of the Miller Affair," op-ed
piece by David Ignatius in the Oct. 5, 2005, Washington Post.
-
"Spin Buster: On 43rd
Street, a Strange Silence Grows Louder," by Steve Lovelady in Columbia
Journalism Review Daily, Oct. 3, 2005.
-
"The Biggest Loser: It's
not Judith Miller. It's the Times editorial board," by Jack Shafer,
published in Slate, Sept. 30, 2005.
-
"Judy Miller: She Walks, She
Talks, But Does She Write?" editor's note from Steve Lovelady, Columbia
Journalism Review Daily, Sept. 30, 2005.
-
"A Source of Encouragement:
A new First Amendment Center/AJR survey finds that 69 percent of
the public thinks journalists should be allowed to keep a news source
confidential," by Rachel Smolkin, from the August/September 2005 issue of
AJR.
-
"Under Fire," by Rachel Smolkin, from the February/March 2005 issue of AJR.
- "Free Press Takes Hit With Recent
Court Rulings," a press release from the Society of Professional
Journalists, Feb. 16, 2005.
- The Project on Government Oversight,
a
nonprofit watchdog group that
supplies trusted reporters with names of sources who must remain
confidential.
-
The majority opinion in the landmark Supreme Court
decision on reporter-source confidentiality handed down June 29, 1972, in
Branzburg vs. Hayes.
-
A dissent from Justice William O. Douglas in the 1972 Branzburg case.
STORY 4:
“Gun-toting Journalists: It's long been taboo for reporters to carry
weapons. But what do you do when you're in constant danger, your colleagues are
being gunned down and the authorities can't protect you?”
By Sherry Ricchiardi
MORE INFO:
In the Philippines, where the Committee to Protect Journalists reports that
five journalists have been killed in 2005, and 22 have been slain since 2000,
some journalists decided the time had come to arm themselves. The decision has
stirred discussions in the United States, where editors traditionally enforce
rules against newsroom personnel carrying guns. U.S. editors have argued
gun-toting reporters in war zones could be mistaken for spies or soldiers. They
also say carrying weapons could force journalists into being participants in
stories, rather than neutral observers.
CLASS DISCUSSIONS:
- Split the class into two teams for a debate on whether
or not it's OK for journalists to pack weapons. Ask the teams if they need to
draw distinctions between the situation in the Philippines - where the danger zone is the whole country - and the United States, where it would be
more typical for a reporter to be tempted to carry a weapon while covering a
war overseas. (See AJR Drop Cap, "Guns Under Fire,"
in the April/May 2004 issue for a discussion of the controversy over reporter
Dexter Filkins' decision to carry a gun while reporting from Iraq.) Also ask
the teams to touch on the recent situation in New Orleans in the aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina: Times-Picayune reporter Brian Thevenot wrote in a
first-person account ("Apocalypse in New Orleans," October/November 2005 AJR)
that, on the advice of police, the tiny band of reporters who stayed behind in
the evacuated city carried weapons to defend themselves against looters and
thugs.
-
Invite war reporters in from local newspapers and TV stations for a discussion
on whether they think it's ever appropriate to carry a weapon while on
assignment.
ADDITIONAL READINGS:
-
"Forced into Hiding,"
by Sherry Ricchiardi, published in the October/November 2005 issue of AJR.
-
"Arming Journalists to Confront Mexico Attacks Will Only
Increase Bloodshed, Warns IFJ," an April 18, 2005, statement from the International
Federation of Journalists.
-
"Carrying," by Rob Steinman, in the October 2004
issue of The Digital Journalist.
-
Romenesko's page on Poynteronline on Dec. 29, 2003, linked to stories in the
Wall Street Journal and the Miami Herald on the Dexter Filkins controversy.
Top of Page | Index Page
Teachers' guide written by
Chris Harvey, online bureau director at the University of Maryland Philip
Merrill College of Journalism and former managing editor of AJR.
First two items published Oct. 9, 2005; additional items added Oct. 10, 2005,
and Oct. 12, 2005.
Copyright © 2005
University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of Journalism.
Permission is granted to freely print, for classroom
use, up to 100 copies of the most up-to-date version of this document, as long
as the document is not modified.
|