|
AJR in the
Classroom
Discussion questions for the August / September 2007 issue, along
with suggestions for further readings on photo manipulation, the wave of layoffs
of film critics, and the media's stereotypical treatment of women.
Story 1: "Distorted Picture" |
Story 2: "The End of the Affair" | Story 3: "The News Media's Woman Problem" | Story 4:
"Justice Delayed"
|
|
| June 1994 covers of Time and Newsweek highlight the potential for digital tampering.
Sherry Ricchiardi notes that Time darkened the skin and added a 5 o'clock
shadow to O.J. Simpson's photo, making him look sinister.
|
STORY 1: "Distorted
Picture: Thanks to Photoshop, it's awfully
easy to manipulate photographs, as a number of recent scandals make painfully
clear. Misuse of the technology poses a serious threat to photojournalism's
credibility."
By Sherry Ricchiardi
MORE INFO FROM
THE STORY: In April, veteran shooter Allan
Detrich was forced out of his job at the Toledo Blade after admitting to being
seduced by the software Photoshop to alter images. Ricchiardi reports that of
the 947 photos Detrich submitted for publication from January through March
2007, 79 had clearly been doctored. But Detrich is by no means alone: Numerous
other photographers in recent years have been fired or reprimanded for
distorting reality in their images. The lapses have prompted discussions on
ethics in newsrooms and at journalism conferences and have pushed some to turn
to the Poynter Institute, the White House News Photographers Association and the
National Press Photographers Association for guidelines to keep up with changes
in technology. CLASS DISCUSSION AND RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT:
Photoshop may have accelerated the frequency of ethical
lapses in photo editing, but photographers practiced fakery long before
the software was created in 1989. Ask students to write a 1,000- to 2,000-word research paper,
including informal citations, on lapses in photo editing ethics throughout
history -- and the impact of those lapses on news publications' credibility
with the public. Students may use Dr. Hany Farid's site on digital tampering
(see related link below) as a starting point.
Ask a photo editor
from a local professional news Web site or newspaper to join a class
discussion on the ethics of photo editing. What specific rules and guidelines are
followed by photographers at the organization? What beyond photo cropping
and simple color correction is
permissible during the editing process?
RELATED STORIES AND
WEB LINKS:
- "Digital
Tampering in Media, Science and Law," by
Dr. Hany Farid, a
professor of computer science at Dartmouth.
- "Digital Manipulation Code of Ethics," from
the National Press Photographers Association.
- "Reuters Apologizes Over Altered Lebanon War Photos, Suspends
Photographer," by Donald R. Winslow, posted Aug. 7, 2006, on nppa.org.
- "Charlotte Observer Photog Fired for Altering Photo, Again," on
Romenesko's blog on poynteronline, posted July 28, 2006.
- "Washington Post Policy on Manipulation of Photographic Images,"
posted by Kenny Irby on poynteronline Sept. 25, 2003.
- "Digital Deception:
How damaging is the threat of manipulating photos to the credibility of
photojournalism?" by Cheryl Johnston, in the May 2003 issue of
American Journalism Review.
-
"Every Picture Can Tell a Lie," by David Shenk, posted Oct. 20, 1997, on Wired
News.
STORY 2: "The
End of the Affair: Squeezed for profits, newspapers
send their staff film critics packing. Is this sound
cost-cutting or a missed opportunity?"
By
Jennifer Dorroh
MORE INFO FROM
THE STORY: Dorroh reports that this year the newspapers in
Tampa, Atlanta, Fort Lauderdale and Denver laid off or reassigned their
staff critics, often replacing their voices with wire reviews. Last
fall, one of the two full-time film critics at the Dallas Morning News
took a buyout and wasn't replaced. The remaining Morning News critic
writes fewer reviews and more features about the film industry and local
movie scene. The staff losses beg the question: Are these smart moves that will free up resources for local coverage? Some
editors say that's true. Others argue that the loss of the reviewers --
and the important conversations they spark about our culture -- will be
missed. Meanwhile, a former arts columnist and reporter for the Seattle
Post-Intelligencer and Seattle Weekly says that newspapers should be
leading the way to make their sites home for the local film-loving
community--rather than allowing Web startups to beat them to that.
CLASS DISCUSSION AND CONTENT ANALYSIS:
How important is it to a film-loving community to
have a local voice reviewing movies -- vs. only being offered a national
reviewer's spin? Invite in local leaders in the arts community for a
class discussion about their thoughts on newspapers' cost-cutting trend to
axe film critics. Be sure to ask the leaders, and the students, where they
turn for movie reviews: local newspapers, news Web sites, TV or radio
stations, or Web site aggregators?
If your local newspapers or news Web sites offer
staff-produced movie reviews, ask students to compare their content to those
offered by national syndicates or wires--perhaps comparing reviews of 10
movies over a month or two. Were the local staff-produced critiques tailored
to the community, or were they similar in points and point of view to the
national reviews? Students should summarize their findings in an analysis
paper, injecting their thoughts on the importance (or lack thereof) of
the local voices.RELATED STORIES, COLUMNS AND LINKS:
-
"Sentinel Kills Local Film Reviews," posted in The Daily Pulp, Bob
Norman's blog, in the May 23, 2007, issue of New Times.
"Screening
Call: An increasingly popular studio tactic - not screening movies -
brings up the 'Do critics matter?' question again, but Owen Gleiberman's
not buying it," by Owen Gleiberman, posted June 12, 2006, on
ew.com.
"Criticism's Status Quo Getting Thumbs Down," by Anne Thompson, in
the June 2, 2006, issue of The Hollywood Reporter
"Studios Turn Thumbs Down on Film Critics," by David Carr, in the
May 29, 2006, issue of The New York Times.
"Freezing Out the Critics," by Marc E. Babej and Tim Pollak, posted
April 19, 2006, on forbes.com.
Move review aggregators RottenTomatoes.com
and metacritic.com underscore the power of the Internet.
STORY 3: "The
News Media's Woman Problem,"
a book review of Caryl Rivers' book, "Selling
Anxiety: How the News Media Scare Women." By Carl Sessions Stepp
MORE INFO
FROM THE REVIEW:
Stepp notes that a central question of the book is: Why do
the media still treat women so stereotypically? He says author Caryl
Rivers records numerous examples of "chain reaction stories" --
superficial trend reports spread from one media outlet to the next. They
deal with topics like "miserable career women have lousy sex ... day care
kids who become nasty bullies ... scary women who get power." But Stepp
notes it remains unclear how representative Rivers' bad examples are.
CLASS ANALYSIS / RESEARCH /
DISCUSSION:
Some have argued that news publications' coverage of
women might be fairer if more women were leading the coverage. Ask
students to write a 1,000- to 2,000-word research paper on the progress
women have made in obtaining newsroom management positions over the last
three decades. Organizations such as the Newspaper Association of
America, the Radio-Television News Directors Association and the Online
News Association may be good starting points for statistical information
(see the NAA link to a 2006 study, below). Students should include
citations for their sources, as end notes or foot notes.
How well are women covered in television news? Ask students to do an informal
qualitative analysis of two weeks worth of coverage of women on a local
station's 10 p.m. or 11 p.m. newscast. Students should list a slug or phrase for
every story reported in the newscast. Every time a woman is mentioned in
one of the stories, students should note that, and jot down words used to
describe her. (Are they inflammatory or
demeaning, positive or straightforward?) At the end of the two weeks, students should type up a summary of their
findings on how frequently women are included in the reports, as news sources or
subjects, and how well their lives are covered. Students should be prepared to
present the summaries to the class.
RELATED COLUMNS, STORIES AND REPORTS:
- "A Complete Picture," by Keith M. Woods, published March 17, 2003, on poynteronline.
- "Women's
news, or women's markets?" by Sarah Rasmusson, published
April 7, 2000, on The Freedom Forum Online.
- "Some progress made in media coverage of women and the economy, but
economic news still a male bastion," published Dec. 2, 1999, on
The
Freedom Forum Online.
-
"Transmitting Values: A Guide to Fairer Journalism,"
by Keith M. Woods, published July 1, 1999, on poynteronline.
- "Media
Coverage of Women and Women's Issues,"
a report by the Media Awareness Network, a Canadian nonprofit
organization.
- "The Source: Newspapers by the Numbers,"
published 2006, by the
Newspaper Association of America.
STORY 4: "Justice
Delayed:
Many in the media jettisoned caution--and the
presumption of innocence--in their coverage of an alleged rape by
Duke lacrosse players, and were too slow to correct the record as
the case unraveled. But some journalists distinguished themselves
with skeptical and incisive reporting."
By
Rachel Smolkin
MORE INFO
FROM THE STORY:
Fueled by then-District Attorney Michael B. Nifong, many in
the media latched on to what Smolkin describes as a "seductive narrative":
rich, wild, white jocks allegedly brutalizing a working-class, black
mother of two. Too often the preconceptions dictated the tone of the coverage
and its volume, Smolkin reports. In retrospect, after the accused
college students were declared innocent of all charges by the North
Carolina attorney general, some said the case was a
reminder of the need for journalistic skepticism -- even when dealing
with official sources. CLASS DISCUSSION
/ RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS:
How often are journalists intentionally or
unintentionally misled by official sources -- such as elected
officials, policemen and prosecutors? Invite in a panel of professional
journalists from area TV and radio stations and newspapers to discuss
beat coverage and the art of successfully navigating around bad
information, spin and outright lies. Ask the journalists for concrete
examples.
Is it time for many news organizations to re-visit their standing policies of
not identifying alleged victims of sexual assault? Ask students to write a
1,000-word, well-researched opinion piece on the question, weaving in background
on why the policies were put in place and the pros and cons of keeping them in
place.RELATED COLUMNS, BLOGS, STORIES AND ROUNDUPS:by Sally Dadisman, in the June/July 2007 issue AJR.
"A Sorry Story, With Apology Yet to Come,"
column by Howard Kurtz, in the April 16, 2007, Washington Post.
"Assessing
the N&O's Lacrosse Coverage,"
column by Ted Vaden, in the April 15, 2007, News & Observer.
"Duke Rape Case Shows Why Censoring Names of Victims Is Bad
Idea," column by Harry Reynolds, in the April 14, 2007, Journal
Gazette and Times-Courier online.
"Everyday Ethics: Winners and Losers in the Duke Lacrosse
Story," roundup by Kelly McBride, Bob Steele and colleagues, in the April
11, 2007, issue of poynteronline.
"Duke Lacrosse Case: Should We Name the Accuser?" column
by Kelly McBride, in the Jan. 24, 2007, issue of poynteronline.
Durham-In-Wonderland blog, by K.C. Johnson, a professor of
history at Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center.
Top of Page |
Index Page
Teachers' guide written and produced by
Chris Harvey, online bureau
director at the University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of Journalism and
a former managing editor of AJR. First
three items for this issue published
Aug. 23, 2007; fourth item published Aug. 28, 2007.
Copyright
© 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 Philip Merrill College of Journalism.
Permission is granted to freely print, for classroom use, up
to 100 copies of the most up-to-date version of this document, as long as the
document is not modified.
|