|
AJR in the Classroom Discussion questions for the February / March 2006 issue, along with suggestions for further readings on the health of the newspaper industry, on using care not to implicate innocents while covering the police beat, and on the podcasting boomlet.
Story 1: "Under Siege" | Story 2: "Dilemma of Interest" | Stories 3: "IPod, You Pod, We All Pod" and 4: "Hype or the Real Deal?" | Story 5: "Blogging on the Hustings"
STORY 1: "Under Siege: Last year was a tough one for the newspaper industry. Papers slashed staffs, shuttered bureaus and cut back on newsholes. What does the future hold?" By Paul Farhi
MORE INFO FROM
THE STORY: Editor & Publisher estimated in November
that newspapers cut about 2,100 jobs of all kinds in 2005; it appears the
business is in the midst of "drastic change, if not grave distress," Farhi
reports.
Competitive pressures from the Internet and 24-hour cable,
shareholders' demands for high returns and rising newsprint prices have all
contributed. And activists decrying the cuts' impacts on newspapers' watchdog
roles - and thus democracy - are joining newsroom staffers in their alarm. But
some say there's room for optimism: "...if we think about how to preserve and
protect the daily paper and how we can reinvent it, if we build a huge online
presence, if we can build other businesses around it, I think the future looks
bright," says Jay Smith, president of Cox Newspapers and chairman of the
Newspaper Association of America. CLASS RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT / DISCUSSION: Ask students to write a 1,500- to 2,000-word research
paper (with footnotes or end notes) on the future of the news business. The
paper should cite futurists, industry analysts and editors and publishers on
where they think the industry is headed in 5, 10, 20 years or more. Will the
deadwood product become extinct? Students could write the paper as a
literature review, but they could also include attributed interviews with
sources. Invite to the class a panel of top editors or
publishers from area professional papers. Ask panelists to discuss if their
publications have been hit by cutbacks, or if they have taken other
cost-cutting measures. If so, what are the implications for the journalism
they produce? Also ask them to discuss the market for graduating seniors:
Are they hiring? Where will the jobs be? ADDITIONAL READINGS AND
OTHER LINKS: "Sherman's
March,"
by Charles Layton, in the February/March 2006 issue of AJR. "The World Needs What We Do," by Donna Shaw, in the
February/March 2006 issue of AJR. "Keeping the Faith," by John Morton, in the
February/March 2006 issue of AJR. "Toward a Paperless Society," by Thomas Kunkel, in the
February/March 2006 issue of AJR. "What Is Journalism Worth?," by O. Ricardo Pimentel,
in
the Feb. 7, 2006, issue of Poynteronline. "Online opportunities make journalism's future bright,
despite gloomy feelings," by Rich Gordon, in the Oct. 27, 2005, issue of
Online Journalism Review. "The Source: Newspapers by the Numbers," a downloadable
document by the Newspaper Association of America (in .pdf format). "Why Choose Journalism? Journalists tell their stories." Eighteen journalists write about
why they love their profession. Published by the American Society of
Newspaper Editors. STORY 2: MORE INFO FROM THE STORY:
According to Shaw, news reporters last year used the term to describe dozens of
people in more than 40 cases, including an Idaho man named by police in
connection with the deaths of a woman, her boyfriend and her son in their Coeur
d'Alene home. At least half of those described as "persons of interest" had not
been charged with a crime. Kelly McBride, ethics group leader at the Poynter
Institute, urges reporters who name "persons of interest" to do so with context
in their stories - after questioning authorities on "why this is a 'person of
interest,' " why that person hasn't been charged, what police have as evidence
against the person, and what their motives are in having the media publish the
information. CLASS DISCUSSION / INTERVIEWING
ASSIGNMENT: Lead a class discussion on when - if ever - it is
acceptable to name someone as a "person of interest" in a published story.
What guidelines should be followed in doing so? And what steps should a news
publication take to correct the perception of guilt surrounding that person,
if someone else is eventually arrested, charged and convicted of the crime? Ask each student to interview (in person or by phone) a
police reporter for a campus or or other local news publication - TV,
newspaper, radio or Web. Find out under what circumstances each reporter
would name someone as a "person of interest" - and what kinds of context and
background the reporter would use in that story. ADDITIONAL READINGS: "Friday
Edition: Persons of Interest," by Al Tompkins, published in the Feb.
26, 2004, issue of Poynteronline. "Into the Spotlight," by Rachel Smolkin, in the
November 2002 issue of AJR. "Going to Extremes," by Alicia C. Shepard, in the
October 1996 issue of AJR. STORIES 3 and 4:
MORE INFO FROM THE TWO COLUMNS: Audio and video podcasts - digital files that can be downloaded on demand onto portable devices such as iPods - are becoming popular with such media giants as National Public Radio, washingtonpost.com, CBS, NBC and ABC - but also with smaller outlets, such as the all-news WTOP radio station in Washington, D.C. But who's actually listening to the programs? Palser reports that Bridge Ratings put the number of Americans who had ever sampled a podcast at about 1.6 percent of the population in late 2005. And media companies, she says, are still working on a sustainable business model.
CLASS DISCUSSION / FIELD TRIP / EXTRA CREDIT:
ADDITIONAL READINGS AND OTHER LINKS:
STORY 5: "Blogging on the Hustings: Bloggers were a significant and cacophonous force in Virginia's gubernatorial election. What was their impact, and was that journalism they were practicing?" by Marc Fisher
MORE INFO FROM THE STORY: Fisher reports that by last November's statewide election -- won by Democrat Tim Kaine -- more than 50 political bloggers had commented on and helped change the course of the campaign. Bloggers gossiped, formed friendships and pushed agendas under sometimes-anonymous postings. Most acknowledged their dependency on traditional media: Few bloggers did original reporting. But some traditional reporters also noted their dependency on the blogs, using them as tip sheets for what other newspapers were reporting and for what bloggers were saying about those reports. CLASS BLOG ANALYSIS / DISCUSSION:
ADDITIONAL READINGS:
Teachers' guide written by Chris Harvey, online bureau
director at the University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of Journalism and
former managing editor of AJR. Copyright © 2006 University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of Journalism. Permission is granted to freely print, for classroom use, up to 100 copies of the most up-to-date version of this document, as long as the document is not modified.
|